A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their planning authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, specially within a sensitive coastal natural environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-large water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that this sort of steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing files, maps, and ailments connected to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing connection to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to establish a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works have already been completed dependant on Experienced guidance and accepted options. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal website has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely Rene Collier and Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much approach.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other long once the authorized expenses have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Irrespective of whether it'll eventually be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.