A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier and also the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has evolved into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design is effective at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to construct their loved ones residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded residents. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying manufactured by their potential neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their scheduling permission by developing a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, therefore places are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly in a very delicate coastal atmosphere including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially created, is in the right place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal organizing disputes, the place sights of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has considering that turn into emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location turned Just about the most striking descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions have been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were included in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a family members residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions happen to be performed based upon Qualified advice and permitted strategies. Their lawyers have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying information.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how scheduling disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than design of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for just a situation that many observers see as progressively common. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation among non-public land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Occasions short article about René Collier mentioned that the businessman had Beforehand been involved with community advocacy on planning and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly different professional backgrounds can discover René Collier and Paul Feely them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared repeatedly in protection, reflecting each the physical truth in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an too much technique.
As being the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains unsure. The court docket must identify whether the wall as developed complies with arranging authorization and no matter whether any encroachment right into a Specific Region of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful expenditures are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent times.